Tee hee

So, I was sitting in a corner... No that's not the right story. The point is, I was thinking about how I feel the world came to be. I think it didn't. Seems reasonable to me to assume that there is no beginning. See, time is a construct. Like location. It is. There is no center, and no point of origin. It seems reasonable to me to assume that we never started, but that, as we approach "before" to such a ridiculous extent we simply have to accept smaller and smaller increments of time. Like location. What I mean is, the point from where the universe expanded still contained all there ever was right? Same idea with time. Our increments of time is shaped by our ideas of seconds, minutes, hours. We see that 100 years is a very long time, because it is longer than our lifetime. But 10,000,000 years is unimaginable to us, for obvious reasons. But on a planetary judgment it isn't. Universally it is extremely acceptable, and only getting more and more so. Eventually, the universe will be able to approach its long increments of time as seconds in our lifetime. But my point is, the "beginning" is an assumption that time is progressive. All time exists. Yesterday is just as real and present as today right? If that is true, if time is a big all encompassing blanket, like all matter, and for that matter all places, than it seems safe, just as place is infinite, time is. Creation... is impossible. There would need to be a point zero, but that isn't possible if all time exists at all times. Get it? To me, when the "big bang" happened, it is just going from an unstable existence to a stable one. I mean, existence didn't just explode into being. Existence just became possible out of what was there but unstable, The way we change according to where we are in time. But all I am saying is that there was always SOMETHING.